I think that if drugs were legalized there would be a lot less drug related violence, for instance, the issue of different drug cartels competing. However, if the drugs were legalized, they would have to be at high prices or taxed pretty high because cheap drugs could lead to a lot more drug users. Then again if they were priced highly people could buy them and sell them illegally not changing the drug market at all. Therefore in the grand scheme of things; no, I don’t think all drugs should be legal.
Yes, they should be. If the worry is that people will be able to harm themselves more easily, then I would say that they could do just as much harm with legal substances. It would probably do more good than harm, such as taking out the black market that is undermining the economy, as well as ruining drug cartels.
I am strongly against the legalization of all drugs. I can see how one might make the argument for decriminalizing the use of drugs to prevent the punishment of dependent addicts in need of help, but really outright legalization is a considerably more drastic measure then is needed to do so. I think legalization opens up so many more problems than it solves. A lot of proponents argue that newly legalized substances could be highly regulated and taxed to provide funding for needing sectors like education, but what kind of message does it send to the international community if we’re sending our kids to school on drug money? A lot of people will also point fingers towards countries like The Netherlands and New Zealand where similar legalization has been tried, citing the general downward trend in overall drug use, but the fact remains that these countries are not at all like the US. There is not and never was in those countries cartel based drug trade on the massive scale we see it here in the US. To legalize that trade would only increase its size and give even more money to the criminal organizations participating in it. Due to years of criminalization, those involved in the illegal drug trade currently are largely criminal individuals. While the average dealer might not necessarily be a terrible person, those coordinating the smuggling and distribution of these substances are not, generally speaking, the most moral (and more importantly, law regarding) individuals. Legalization would validate their cartels entirely and perpetuate a trade which has far more numerous negative effects on society than simply the creation of addicts. On that note, to allow addicts to continue using freely creates an even larger public health concern than illegal drugs currently do, this isn’t just immoral, it’s uneconomical and socially irresponsible. Do I think totally dependent addicts should be thrown in jail for using? No, not at all, they’re the biggest victims of illicit substances, they haven’t necessarily done anything wrong yet and are suffering both physically and legally for it. Complete legalization wouldn’t be helping them at all, however; it would do nothing but benefit further the criminals already fed by the drug trade and open the door to increase new user-ship on the whole. There is no way I could support complete legalization.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.